on airlines & baggage

As anyone who has ever flown in, once seen, or thought about an airplane, I feel as though it is my patriotic duty to add my inflation adjusted $0.02 into the mix.

In-case you have been hiding under a rock for the past week, Spirit Airlines announced that they will charge up to $45 for passengers bringing carry-on bags onto it’s jets this summer. The announcement has been met with much controversy and has even sparked a new Bill in congress entitled the BAG Act (whose cutesy title makes me gag a little so I won’t repeat it here.)

The great Senator from New York (no, the other one… yes, Schumer… near-sighted protector of consumers everywhere… ok, no? yeah, the CARD Act was short-sighted wasn’t it… ok, that’s a whole other debate, let’s move on…) has received commitment from five domestic airlines that they will not follow suit and also charge for carry-on bags. Unfortunately, the Senator may be on the wrong side of this issue. Closer inspection shows that the argument isn’t so simple.

This is a problem that airlines brought on themselves. Ever since they began charging for checked bags individual consumers decided to outsmart them and bring ever larger bags into the cabin itself. A cabin which was never designed to hold the quantity of cargo it now contains. This causes multiple headaches, it slows down the check-in process, slows down security, slows down boarding and slows down disembarkment. It now takes a solid half hour to board an A-390 as little old women struggle to lift 45-lb suitcases above their heads and into the over-head bins.

Spirit decided to apply a tried-and-true (and effective) economic principle using a (dis)incentive to force people to make a conscious choice about what they are doing. Do I REALLY need my bag with me in the cabin, slowing everyone down, or can it go below?

Of course no one wants to pay any added fees for anything, but perhaps we should all take a good look at what Spirit was trying to accomplish. Maybe folks bringing 40-lb bags into the cabin should pay the fee for the added convenience (for themselves) and inconvenience (for everyone else.)  Then we can all return to sanity and vacationers can check their over-sized and overstuffed bags. While we are at it, airlines should also enforce the rule that your first carry-on goes under your seat. No more putting your coat and purse in the overhead so that your little feets can stretch comfortably. (I’m looking at you.)

This entry was posted in economics, government, insanity, vacation, work. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to on airlines & baggage

  1. washiscoach says:

    So I think Schumer’s involvement reflects more of a frustration over the rate at which previously included services (checked bags, onboard food, seat selection, etc) have become itemized out. While there has been deflation in ticket prices, travelers aren’t seeing a one-for-one discount, just a loss of services and a feeling that they’re being nickel and dimed.

    This deflation in ticket pricing is of course in the face of costs rising for the industry, and largely because of irrational loss-leading pricing. Airlines got a bit more self control with the recent runups in fuel costs, but in order to preserve some kind of margin, they’re being “creative” with these fees. Which are terrible for customer service.

    I will, once again, submit that the battle to get more luggage out of the main cabin cannot succeed without: 1) lower lost/delayed luggage rates, 2) economic incentive for people to check bags (especially since they take more time to deal with on either end) and 3) less theft from bags, whether it be via misbehaving luggage handlers, security people, etc.

    If I didn’t have to deal with this routinely, I’d to sit back and watch the fireworks over this. Unfortunately such is not the case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>