<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for life hereafter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.christopherbrito.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com</link>
	<description>random musings from a wannabe economist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 01:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on clear philadelphia by BradyDale</title>
		<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com/2010/01/13/clear-philadelphia/comment-page-1/#comment-46301</link>
		<dc:creator>BradyDale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 01:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christopherbrito.com/?p=392#comment-46301</guid>
		<description>How do you feel about it now? It&#039;s almost 11 months later. Have they covered the city better? I&#039;m considering going with Clear when I get back from Thanksgiving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you feel about it now? It&#8217;s almost 11 months later. Have they covered the city better? I&#8217;m considering going with Clear when I get back from Thanksgiving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on on airlines &amp; baggage by washiscoach</title>
		<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com/2010/04/18/on-airlines-baggage/comment-page-1/#comment-40984</link>
		<dc:creator>washiscoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christopherbrito.com/?p=412#comment-40984</guid>
		<description>So I think Schumer&#039;s involvement reflects more of a frustration over the rate at which previously included services (checked bags, onboard food, seat selection, etc) have become itemized out. While there has been deflation in ticket prices, travelers aren&#039;t seeing a one-for-one discount, just a loss of services and a feeling that they&#039;re being nickel and dimed. 

This deflation in ticket pricing is of course in the face of costs rising for the industry, and largely because of irrational loss-leading pricing. Airlines got a bit more self control with the recent runups in fuel costs, but in order to preserve some kind of margin, they&#039;re being &quot;creative&quot; with these fees. Which are terrible for customer service.

I will, once again, submit that the battle to get more luggage out of the main cabin cannot succeed without: 1) lower lost/delayed luggage rates, 2) economic incentive for people to check bags (especially since they take more time to deal with on either end) and 3) less theft from bags, whether it be via misbehaving luggage handlers, security people, etc.

If I didn&#039;t have to deal with this routinely, I&#039;d to sit back and watch the fireworks over this. Unfortunately such is not the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I think Schumer&#8217;s involvement reflects more of a frustration over the rate at which previously included services (checked bags, onboard food, seat selection, etc) have become itemized out. While there has been deflation in ticket prices, travelers aren&#8217;t seeing a one-for-one discount, just a loss of services and a feeling that they&#8217;re being nickel and dimed. </p>
<p>This deflation in ticket pricing is of course in the face of costs rising for the industry, and largely because of irrational loss-leading pricing. Airlines got a bit more self control with the recent runups in fuel costs, but in order to preserve some kind of margin, they&#8217;re being &#8220;creative&#8221; with these fees. Which are terrible for customer service.</p>
<p>I will, once again, submit that the battle to get more luggage out of the main cabin cannot succeed without: 1) lower lost/delayed luggage rates, 2) economic incentive for people to check bags (especially since they take more time to deal with on either end) and 3) less theft from bags, whether it be via misbehaving luggage handlers, security people, etc.</p>
<p>If I didn&#8217;t have to deal with this routinely, I&#8217;d to sit back and watch the fireworks over this. Unfortunately such is not the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on life, death and taxes by R. Brito</title>
		<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com/2010/03/31/life-death-and-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-40893</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Brito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christopherbrito.com/?p=404#comment-40893</guid>
		<description>Then again, you could move to the Republic of Texas and live in a
state with no income tax.  The joy of just handing money to the Feds!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then again, you could move to the Republic of Texas and live in a<br />
state with no income tax.  The joy of just handing money to the Feds!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on get real by britoman</title>
		<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com/2009/12/04/get-real/comment-page-1/#comment-38763</link>
		<dc:creator>britoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christopherbrito.com/?p=372#comment-38763</guid>
		<description>Completely agree, it is a pre-requisite. I&#039;m just frustrated at the way the local-news-style media get so excited over the tid-bit of information with no real understanding of the underlying data. Le sigh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree, it is a pre-requisite. I&#8217;m just frustrated at the way the local-news-style media get so excited over the tid-bit of information with no real understanding of the underlying data. Le sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on get real by washiscoach</title>
		<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com/2009/12/04/get-real/comment-page-1/#comment-38366</link>
		<dc:creator>washiscoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christopherbrito.com/?p=372#comment-38366</guid>
		<description>The only other part of the data that I think was actual good news was the downward revision of job losses in the two prior months.

While still not indicative of strong expansion, a reduction in job loss rates is a prerequisite for a recovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only other part of the data that I think was actual good news was the downward revision of job losses in the two prior months.</p>
<p>While still not indicative of strong expansion, a reduction in job loss rates is a prerequisite for a recovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on to crash a state dinner by washiscoach</title>
		<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com/2009/11/26/to-crash-a-state-dinner/comment-page-1/#comment-38194</link>
		<dc:creator>washiscoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christopherbrito.com/?p=360#comment-38194</guid>
		<description>Here you go:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34173530/ns/politics-white_house/?ocid=twitter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here you go:<br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34173530/ns/politics-white_house/?ocid=twitter" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34173530/ns/politics-white_house/?ocid=twitter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on to crash a state dinner by britoman</title>
		<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com/2009/11/26/to-crash-a-state-dinner/comment-page-1/#comment-38181</link>
		<dc:creator>britoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christopherbrito.com/?p=360#comment-38181</guid>
		<description>Completely agree! Not really worried about weapons or anything, just the fact that you can gain physical access to the building. That is more than half the effort right there. Once your in and have access, its only a matter of time before you can figure out some other weaknesses. 

Like I said, some low level chum (and probably some higher level one) is going to atone for this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree! Not really worried about weapons or anything, just the fact that you can gain physical access to the building. That is more than half the effort right there. Once your in and have access, its only a matter of time before you can figure out some other weaknesses. </p>
<p>Like I said, some low level chum (and probably some higher level one) is going to atone for this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on to crash a state dinner by washiscoach</title>
		<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com/2009/11/26/to-crash-a-state-dinner/comment-page-1/#comment-38175</link>
		<dc:creator>washiscoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christopherbrito.com/?p=360#comment-38175</guid>
		<description>The Secret Service was quick to point out that they had to pass through the same security screening as everyone else. This is true - it would have been hard for them to smuggle through weapons - but what if they were martial arts experts? Their physical access would have allowed them to at least inflict some damage before being taken down.

It&#039;s pretty interesting that they got on the grounds without having to be matched against a list. That list comparison check is pretty much Physical Security 101 - even if they&#039;re brilliant at social engineering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Secret Service was quick to point out that they had to pass through the same security screening as everyone else. This is true &#8211; it would have been hard for them to smuggle through weapons &#8211; but what if they were martial arts experts? Their physical access would have allowed them to at least inflict some damage before being taken down.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty interesting that they got on the grounds without having to be matched against a list. That list comparison check is pretty much Physical Security 101 &#8211; even if they&#8217;re brilliant at social engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the cloud? by britoman</title>
		<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com/2009/08/25/the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-35439</link>
		<dc:creator>britoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christopherbrito.com/?p=302#comment-35439</guid>
		<description>geeze... I wonder if the NSA has already done this and could save that poor guy some time :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>geeze&#8230; I wonder if the NSA has already done this and could save that poor guy some time <img src='http://blog.christopherbrito.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the cloud? by hiscoach</title>
		<link>http://blog.christopherbrito.com/2009/08/25/the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-35421</link>
		<dc:creator>hiscoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christopherbrito.com/?p=302#comment-35421</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one use: http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10316812-245.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesArea.1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one use: <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10316812-245.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesArea.1" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10316812-245.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesArea.1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

